PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120321 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 12 '20 at 05:28 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | BRN-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
68%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 85 75 73 78 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
366GB free
Firmware: 1AN10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 39 43 43 41 41 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
591GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 83 93 93 82 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 103 101 102 103 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
211GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 64 73 73 66 MB/s
|
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 33x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 25x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $308 |