Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 14:50
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$157
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 297
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 838
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 1077
67% 1077 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 122
Parallax 126
109% 127 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 243 244 234 241 243 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,657
Write 233
Mixed 521
SusWrite 247
144% 664 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 64.2
237% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 363
333% 533 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 182%
Great: 226%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 128 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 136
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 126
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 7.7
Mixed 14
SusWrite 3.5
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 37.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback