Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 11:22
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 369
52% 383 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38.3
37% 38.3 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 42
Splatting 36.6
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 79.5
Write 48.2
Mixed 28
11% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 14
65% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 23.8
38% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 129 137 102 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 113
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 109%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
170GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 81 82 79 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 67.2
Write 68.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 80
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 104%
USB2.0 VIKINGMAN 32GB
29GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 10 8.8 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 9.7
9% 7.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2400 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $739
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback