Asus ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-11400-$148
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 886
83% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$360
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 121
Parallax 130
107% 127 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 311 312 314 315 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,772
Mixed 1,347
SusWrite 499
274% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 77.3
296% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,222
896% 1171 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 221%
Great: 272%
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
45GB free
Firmware: ECFK52.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 69
Write 876
Mixed 65.3
78% 337 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 1.7
37% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 366
238% 281 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$66
273GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 40.1
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 104%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$73
114GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 76 80 95 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 63.7
Write 80.4
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 80.5
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
226GB free, PID 0821
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 20
SusWrite 79.8
116% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 38.9
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 32.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 43: 3R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 25% 69 106 5 144 27" 2560 1440 PHLC21F PHL 275M8
History: Score 9: 0R 1G 6B | Score 43: 3R 7G 7B
Typical ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 1,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B560-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback