Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415DAP
Memory10.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 103
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 4.1
54% 64 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 68.9
21% 132 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1FAF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.22
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.8
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 101 34 122 62 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 347
Write 771
Mixed 248
SusWrite 79.8
82% 361 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 97.6
DQ Mixed 348
181% 149 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C22-16GRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 3.3
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 7.58
528% 7.58 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback