MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 11:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 180
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 402
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 858E) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 34 32 19 46 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 346
Write 14.3
Mixed 274
SusWrite 34
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 31.7
DQ Mixed 14.6
31% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 71%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 134 133 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 134
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
247% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback