HP 750-467c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 750-467c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 828A
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '20 at 17:59
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 186 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 623 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% HP(103C 2B63) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 19.7 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 16.7 17% 21 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 614GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 138 128 134 132 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 140 Write 126 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 133 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 112%
KINGWIN EZD-2537U3 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 180GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 1.3 2.3 0.9 2.4 2.5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.66% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 31.3 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 2.4 26% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 4.66% Great: 68%
KINGWIN EZD-2537U3 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 441GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 52 56 67 87 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.5% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 53 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 67.6 70% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 20.4 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 19.4 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 750-467c Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP 750-467c

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	3x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $48Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	8x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	4x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	3x

RAM
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GBRamaxelBench 68%, 405 samples	21x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 382 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369