HP 750-467c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 750-467c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 828A
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	11.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 217 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 649 65% 528 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% HP(103C 2B63) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.3 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 19.7 16% 18.9 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 16.5 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 669GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 73 51 81 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 24.8 Write 80.3 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 62 37% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 40% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 112%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 860GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 47 50 45 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 39.8 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 45.9 58% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 19.9 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 22.4 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 750-467c Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP 750-467c

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	3x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	8x
SSD 1TBBench 80%, 9,059 samples	4x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	3x

RAM
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GBRamaxelBench 68%, 405 samples	21x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 382 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $307

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16