Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$170 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 180 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 288 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$80 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 17.9 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 22 Splatting 15.8 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 200 231 231 234 240 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 412 Write 233 Mixed 204 SusWrite 225 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 22.3 100% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 175 163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 130 131 131 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 138 Mixed 80 SusWrite 130 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.6% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.9 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 19.7 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	54.6"	1920 1080	SAM0F39 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MR Prof. i52000/C205 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $170Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $80Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

RAM
F4-3200C16-8GVKB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBUnknownBench 70%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $419	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)