Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MR Prof. i52000/C205  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 288
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.9
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 22
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 200 231 231 234 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 412
Write 233
Mixed 204
SusWrite 225
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 22.3
100% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 175
163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 130 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 138
Mixed 80
SusWrite 130
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MR Prof. i52000/C205 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Medion MR Prof. i52000/C205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback