HP 750-467c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-467c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 13:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 235
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 613
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
HP(103C 2B63) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.7
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 149 69 62 80 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 189
Write 184
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 96.8
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 112%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB
860GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 32
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 37.5
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 22.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-467c Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 750-467c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback