Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 10:11
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 195
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 498
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 68.6
58% 71.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 328 177 214 215 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 99.7
Mixed 159
SusWrite 232
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 26.4
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 209
154% 203 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 102%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59
223GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 134 140 150 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 286
Write 185
Mixed 216
SusWrite 141
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 28.4
102% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 152
124% 174 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 10 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $909
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback