Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130815
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4340-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 139
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
EVGA(3842 6153) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 38.3
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 31.3
27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 62 59 61 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 86
Mixed 50
SusWrite 59.3
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 58%
KINGWIN EZD-2537U3 1TB
839GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 180 178 170 184 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 156
Write 152
Mixed 38
SusWrite 178
174% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback