Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 207
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 682
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 156
91% 118 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 118
Splatting 123
91% 109 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M C6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 108 80 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 116
SusWrite 96.5
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 19.9
75% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 47
DQ Mixed 23.2
21% 31 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 92%
Md07500- ALDW-RO 750GB
171GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 101 101 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 84.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 100
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback