Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 213 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 691 68% 557 Pts	64-Core 762 47% 762 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 82.7 Parallax 150 90% 114 fps	MRender 86.1 Gravity 117 Splatting 122 91% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: M C6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 112 114 69 34 76 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 120 Write 108 Mixed 114 SusWrite 82.1 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 20.1 74% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 0.5 10% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 92%
Md07500- ALDW-RO 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 148GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 101 101 101 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.5% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 96.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 100 65% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 53.6 75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $385