Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 95 1-Core 107 2-Core 222 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 675 69% 557 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 84.4 Parallax 162 86% 117 fps	MRender 87.7 Gravity 112 Splatting 126 91% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: M C6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 109 103 72 64 58 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 116 Write 104 Mixed 106 SusWrite 83.2 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 15.1 52% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 18.7 DQ Write 39.3 DQ Mixed 20.2 18% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 92%
Md07500- ALDW-RO 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 353GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 102 102 103 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56% Above average	Read 93 Write 68.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 102 60% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 13.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $385