Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 96.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 223 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 714 71% 578 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 85.9 Parallax 147 86% 113 fps	MRender 87.7 Gravity 113 Splatting 127 91% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: M C6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 60 75 49 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 121 Write 111 Mixed 114 SusWrite 87.9 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 20.7 73% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 46 DQ Mixed 22.1 20% 30 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 92%
Md07500- ALDW-RO 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 353GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 89 88 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.9% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 89 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 88.8 61% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 146% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 53.2 75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $385