Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 194 78% 131 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 681 67% 550 Pts	64-Core 796 49% 796 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.8% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 82.9 Parallax 161 88% 117 fps	MRender 85.4 Gravity 117 Splatting 122 90% 108 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: M C6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 104 15 76 75 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.3% Poor	Read 120 Write 111 Mixed 114 SusWrite 81.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 0.4 48% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 6.3 DQ Mixed 0.4 4% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 92%
Md07500- ALDW-RO 750GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 254GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 100 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.9% Above average	Read 80.5 Write 82.8 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 100 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 12.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $385