Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 16:34
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 317
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,207
109% 918 Pts
64-Core 2,284
141% 2,284 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2207 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 123
Parallax 104
89% 112 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 106
Splatting 111
89% 109 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 619 610 617 616 618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 2357
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 894
413% 1,850 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 102
350% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,433
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,025% 1,371 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 328%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 233 225 233 229 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 244
Write 98.3
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 228
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 11.3
48% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 100%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
147GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1091 1092 1088 1096 1093 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,713
Write 128
Mixed 216
SusWrite 1,092
172% 787 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 48.4
189% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 537
509% 784 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 233%
Great: 228%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
96GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 120 127 129 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 120
Write 140
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 123
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
806GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 119 122 124 123 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 91.4
Write 118
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 119
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
830GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 124 122 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 155
Write 151
Mixed 125
SusWrite 123
186% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 51
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 45.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $489
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback