Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 20:08
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,209
108% 911 Pts
64-Core 2291
142% 2291 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2207 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 116
Parallax 98.5
85% 106 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 103
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2278 615 605 620 616 615 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2,355
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 892
409% 1830 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 98.5
340% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 1,246
DQ Mixed 1,283
971% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 320%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 211 239 215 33 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 290
Write 97.6
Mixed 194
SusWrite 174
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 30.2
115% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 117
119% 192 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 100%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
153GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 207 139 142 144 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,701
Write 1065
Mixed 1,013
SusWrite 309
226% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 51.2
258% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 533
507% 783 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 204%
Great: 228%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
125GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 112 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 71.2
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 113
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 54 58 47 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 49.9
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 52.8
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 118
SusWrite 100
169% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 50.3
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 44.2
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 136%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback