Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 307
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,217
106% 905 Pts
64-Core 2,294
142% 2,294 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2207 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 113
Parallax 96.8
84% 104 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 101
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2273 609 606 609 617 616 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,597
Write 2,378
Mixed 1,581
SusWrite 888
416% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 101
348% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1,297
974% 1,300 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 324%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
174GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 225 215 215 215 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 392
Write 239
Mixed 234
SusWrite 233
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 29.1
117% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 212
170% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
152GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 666 142 133 133 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1,094
Mixed 1,002
SusWrite 384
233% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 52.1
278% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 537
512% 790 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 215%
Great: 228%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
125GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 113 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 32.1
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 116
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 161 170 174 169 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 113
Write 125
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 167
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 114
SusWrite 125
172% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 51.1
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 45.3
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback