Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,225
110% 927 Pts
64-Core 2273
141% 2273 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2207 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 123
Parallax 104
88% 112 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 107
Splatting 110
89% 109 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2283 613 614 618 617 618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,371
Mixed 1,550
SusWrite 894
413% 1,850 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 102
350% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1429
DQ Write 1,330
DQ Mixed 1,357
1,024% 1,372 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 328%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 229 197 34 128 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 228
Write 97.8
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 166
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 11.3
47% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 100%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
147GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1093 1088 872 126 127 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1698
Write 1,092
Mixed 1,015
SusWrite 574
243% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 52.4
280% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 536
508% 783 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 226%
Great: 228%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
96GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 113 120 113 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 112
Write 43.7
Mixed 74
SusWrite 117
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
806GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 122 124 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 68.1
Write 118
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 117
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 90%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
830GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 124 113 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 159
Write 161
Mixed 124
SusWrite 122
190% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 50.9
150% 52.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 45.3
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 140%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback