Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 13:36
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 805
83% 671 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 157
Parallax 167
140% 165 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 141
Splatting 114
122% 155 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 127%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 617 344 253 240 236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,767
Write 646
Mixed 522
SusWrite 387
182% 830 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 53.6
250% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 618
521% 768 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 206%
Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
42GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 461 466 444 249 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 481
Mixed 323
SusWrite 385
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 42.4
165% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 69.2
130% 258 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
189GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 434 443 452 421 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 452
Mixed 419
SusWrite 434
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 60.9
210% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 297
241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 128%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
93GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 102
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
183GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 149 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 110
Mixed 85
SusWrite 148
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 28.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 29.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback