Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 13:53
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 878
93% 741 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4131 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 159
Parallax 14.1
142% 116 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 146
Splatting 118
126% 161 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 130%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,182
Write 1,668
Mixed 666
331% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 66.7
276% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 1,369
DQ Mixed 874
758% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
42GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 490 498 422 327 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 493
Mixed 326
SusWrite 452
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 44
171% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 69.2
127% 250 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 116%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
191GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 475 474 475 476 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 468
Mixed 442
SusWrite 475
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 67
224% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 301
244% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 136%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
100GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 103 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 102
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
159GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 146 146 150 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 149
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 149
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 29.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback