Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 13:44
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 282
100% 179 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 875
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4131 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 161
Parallax 175
142% 170 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 146
Splatting 117
126% 160 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 129%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,135
Write 1,681
Mixed 828
341% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 71.2
303% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1129
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 969
809% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
42GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 487 498 467 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 490
Mixed 328
SusWrite 446
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 43.8
169% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 68.9
128% 252 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 115%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
191GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 474 471 475 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 471
Mixed 433
SusWrite 473
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 63
218% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 298
242% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 133%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
72GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 85.5
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
159GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 143 146 148 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 156
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 149
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 28.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback