Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 13:26
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 310
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 865
82% 681 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 155
Parallax 168
139% 164 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 140
Splatting 114
121% 154 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 262 255 251 248 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,777
Write 623
Mixed 483
SusWrite 270
172% 789 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 52.3
254% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1037
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 669
538% 768 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 200%
Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
42GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 473 148 455 207 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 334
SusWrite 346
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 43.7
166% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 69.4
129% 256 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
189GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 458 462 446 417 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 462
Mixed 440
SusWrite 444
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67
221% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 305
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 133%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
93GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 103 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 87
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 102
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
183GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 147 148 149 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 136
Write 115
Mixed 85
SusWrite 147
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback