Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 130
2-Core 241
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 674
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 155
Parallax 165
138% 163 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 140
Splatting 114
121% 153 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 204 198 193 191 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1324
Write 283
Mixed 260
SusWrite 204
112% 518 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 43.2
188% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 504
423% 632 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 153%
Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
29GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 261 202 190 162 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 437
Write 396
Mixed 267
SusWrite 189
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 31.7
125% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 68.8
124% 244 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
191GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 380 381 389 388 405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 380
Mixed 356
SusWrite 385
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 43.3
152% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 304
244% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
72GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 99
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 87.9
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
186GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 133 129 126 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 16.3
Write 46
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 133
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 28.5
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback