Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 290
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 862
89% 718 Pts
64-Core 874
54% 874 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 158
Parallax 169
140% 166 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 142
Splatting 115
123% 156 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 127%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,150
Write 1,762
Mixed 743
342% 1,552 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 68.4
276% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 1,383
DQ Mixed 886
765% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
42GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 489 488 344 195 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 496
Mixed 328
SusWrite 397
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 43.6
169% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 69
131% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
191GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 473 473 473 471 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 471
Mixed 432
SusWrite 472
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 62.7
217% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 306
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 133%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
72GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 97
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 89.5
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
186GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 148 145 149 149 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 194
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 149
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 29.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback