Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151126
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '16 at 16:33
Run Duration	924 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 184 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 686 63% 530 Pts	64-Core 857 53% 857 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.4% Very good	Lighting 92.2 Reflection 105 Parallax 100 75% 99 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 105 Splatting 97.2 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 904GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3475 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2931 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 957820559	94.4% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 487 Mixed 485 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 23 114% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 133 126% 194 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 780GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 928 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 749 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2371573428	89.1% Excellent	Read 508 Write 399 Mixed 348 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 26.2 119% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 109 107% 169 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 632GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1063 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 836 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2295645635	86.7% Excellent	Read 514 Write 410 Mixed 420 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 24.2 110% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 95 96% 154 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 133%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.11% Terrible	Read 29 Write 6.9 Mixed 10.8 16% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.87 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.02 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 9.04 Mixed 16.5 20% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.09 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.005 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 7%
Generic MS/MS-Pro/HG 0GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1345 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.47% Terrible	Read 6.47 Write 1.27 Mixed 2.13 3% 3.29 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.08 4K Mixed 0.04 4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 43.9 MC Mixed 44.8 126% 44.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 22.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16