Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 697
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 121
Parallax 122
93% 119 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 104
Splatting 92.3
80% 98.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 341 302 328 319 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 412
Mixed 381
SusWrite 322
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 41
143% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 54.1
82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
890GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 350 353 351 350 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 482
Write 438
Mixed 372
SusWrite 351
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 35.9
125% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 48
73% 144 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
512GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 351 353 351 350 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 460
Write 412
Mixed 416
SusWrite 351
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 37.9
128% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 51.5
73% 141 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 133%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.9 7.2 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 27.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6.3
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 11%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 8.4 7.2 8 7.6 7.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 10.8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 7.6
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 45.3
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 23.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 115%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback