Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151126
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '19 at 20:54
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 190 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 690 65% 538 Pts	64-Core 852 53% 852 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 116 Parallax 122 84% 114 fps	MRender 98.4 Gravity 104 Splatting 89.1 79% 97.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 692GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 299 245 103 90 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 444 Write 442 Mixed 382 SusWrite 196 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 45 154% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 53.1 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 115 101% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 921GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 378 381 414 421 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 447 Write 440 Mixed 369 SusWrite 398 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 38.6 134% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 195 172% 257 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 542GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 377 380 302 258 264 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 432 Mixed 405 SusWrite 325 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 41.7 138% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 256 188% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 133%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-MS 0GB 0GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.54% Terrible	Read 1.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 2 SusWrite 1.3 2% 1.47 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s

PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 25.9 Mixed 2 10% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.2 7.5 8.4 8.4 8.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 5.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 8 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.7 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 45.3 128% 44.7 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.9 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16