Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '16 at 16:20
Run Duration866 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 217
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 671
62% 518 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 105
Parallax 100
89% 105 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 104
Splatting 86.7
78% 96.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$217
929GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 495
Mixed 448
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 28.9
120% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 125
129% 210 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 395
Mixed 346
92% 417 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 36.6
131% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 81.9
97% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139
737GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 516
Write 410
Mixed 410
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 24.9
120% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 101
99% 158 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 133%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 8.73
Mixed 8.54
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.25
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.007
16% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 5.79
Mixed 7.15
12% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.25
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
16% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 7%
Generic MS/MS-Pro/HG 0GB
0GB free, PID 1345
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.59% Terrible
Read 6.74
Write 1.45
Mixed 2.65
4% 3.61 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.05
5% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 44.9
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 22.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback