Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration	421 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 713 67% 554 Pts	64-Core 857 53% 857 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 106 Parallax 102 90% 106 fps	MRender 99.3 Gravity 105 Splatting 96.3 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 925GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7855 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5825 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 60 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1036040840	101% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 500 Mixed 445 109% 490 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 23.2 132% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 108 119% 200 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 719GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5310 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3643 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18290498470	91.5% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 399 Mixed 337 92% 417 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 20.7 129% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 84.4 97% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 640GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5442 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3730 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 49 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7247675274	93.4% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 413 Mixed 422 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 27.7 132% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 99.8 96% 152 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 133%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 8.08 Mixed 12 17% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.99 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.01 23% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 27.3 Write 5.8 Mixed 7.32 13% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.35 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.004 24% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	115% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 45.3 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 22.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	227x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16