Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration421 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 704
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 848
57% 848 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 106
Parallax 102
89% 106 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 96.3
84% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 90%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$389
925GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 526
Write 500
Mixed 445
109% 490 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 23.2
132% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 108
119% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$200
719GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 399
Mixed 337
92% 417 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 20.7
129% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 84.4
97% 165 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$200
640GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 413
Mixed 422
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 27.7
132% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 99.8
96% 152 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 133%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 8.08
Mixed 12
17% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.99
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.01
23% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
30GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.74% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.32
13% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.35
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
24% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.74%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 45.3
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 22.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $1,284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback