Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 13:50
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 92.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 219 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 639 65% 524 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 120 Parallax 121 93% 118 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 103 Splatting 90 79% 97.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 678GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 123 197 248 226 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 474 Write 355 Mixed 398 SusWrite 218 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 43.4 147% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 40 82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 890GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 374 370 362 370 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 480 Write 419 Mixed 380 SusWrite 366 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 37.3 127% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 84.7 DQ Mixed 47.3 72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 512GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 376 369 362 370 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 420 Mixed 360 SusWrite 366 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 38.5 132% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 51.4 72% 139 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 133%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 2.5 6 8.4 7.4 8 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 27.8 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.2 22% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 11%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.6 9 8 7.6 8.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 3.5 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 7.9 13% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 8x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	115% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 44.3 MC Mixed 45.4 128% 44.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 23.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16