Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 753
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1876 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.7% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 95.5
Parallax 78.5
66% 85.2 fps
MRender 83.4
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 84
67% 82 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 523 467 579 567 509 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 1,087
Mixed 1,189
SusWrite 533
299% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 86.9
295% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 290
346% 605 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 263%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
84GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 237 228 302 238 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 377
Write 130
Mixed 339
SusWrite 256
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 26.8
123% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 139
139% 217 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 91%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 79 78 84 79 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.5% Average
Read 223
Write 102
Mixed 84
SusWrite 142
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 4.2
41% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 166
164% 257 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
36GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 134 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 483
Mixed 336
SusWrite 160
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.7
186% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 312
250% 351 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: E8TM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 457 456 457 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 823
Write 438
Mixed 558
SusWrite 456
127% 569 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48.5
182% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 335
272% 381 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 135%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 150 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 156
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 150
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 42.6
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 36.8
109% 38.3 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 131%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback