PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20201021 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 23 '22 at 13:56 |
Run Duration | 243 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
88.8%
Excellent
|
90% 169 Pts
|
98% 821 Pts
|
86% 1386 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
|
53.2%
Above average
|
54% 65.2 fps
|
52% 64.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 266 263 264 265 263 MB/s
|
229%
Outstanding
|
273% 1,234 MB/s
|
262% 94.2 MB/s
|
756% 1,002 MB/s
|
![]() HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
112GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 106 97 90 94 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
123% 46.5 MB/s
|
81% 110 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
419GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 419 425 428 441 413 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
96% 427 MB/s
|
176% 60.7 MB/s
|
150% 200 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
575GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 150 151 153 153 151 MB/s
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
224% 1.7 MB/s
|
|
![]() SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.5 4 4 3.6 MB/s
|
8.48%
Terrible
|
14% 11.3 MB/s
|
66% 1.83 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
65.2%
Good
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
62% 21.5 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $176Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 4,720x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $169Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 4,347x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $136Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 3,475x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $460Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2,282x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 2,104x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,496x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $879 |