Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 856
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2189 MHz, MLim: 2225 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 120
Parallax 103
0% 74.2 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 103
Splatting 108
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 1089 683 449 741 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,645
Write 1,103
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 677
311% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 89
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 493
485% 765 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 281%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
84GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 236 238 237 239 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 444
Write 425
Mixed 337
SusWrite 247
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 26.6
128% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 142
141% 218 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 79 78 84 79 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 258
Write 102
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 143
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 10.6
50% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
36GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 115 134 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 433
Mixed 332
SusWrite 156
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.2
189% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 315
252% 353 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: E8TM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 454 454 454 455 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 799
Write 427
Mixed 559
SusWrite 454
125% 560 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 49.7
187% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 342
275% 384 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 135%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 152 152 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 168
Mixed 33
SusWrite 151
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 41.2
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 36.4
110% 38.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 129%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback