Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 753
77% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2160 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.6% Poor
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 124
Parallax 101
4% 76.6 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 101
Splatting 108
62% 69.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 273 320 239 272 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 2,020
Write 378
Mixed 427
SusWrite 282
168% 777 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 56.1
205% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 296
230% 320 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 176%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
84GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 224 234 226 227 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 422
Write 360
Mixed 322
SusWrite 241
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 25.9
124% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 141
140% 217 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 91%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 79 78 83 78 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 454
Write 423
Mixed 343
SusWrite 135
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 28.3
126% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 166
164% 259 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 96%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
36GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 133 134 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 471
Mixed 330
SusWrite 157
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53
183% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 311
250% 351 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: E8TM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 451 452 431 436 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 446
Mixed 549
SusWrite 444
126% 566 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47.8
178% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 335
271% 380 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 133%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 144 116 141 150 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 139
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 42.1
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 36.2
108% 37.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 130%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback