Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '19 at 00:34
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 800
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2204 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 124
Parallax 118
98% 121 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 110
Splatting 112
90% 110 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 910 874 424 1087 985 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,633
Write 1,130
Mixed 1,214
SusWrite 758
316% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 88
301% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 493
482% 758 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 285%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
84GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 237 310 239 312 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 312
Write 97.2
Mixed 141
SusWrite 273
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 24.3
105% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 142
132% 199 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 91%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 79 78 83 78 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 454
Mixed 342
SusWrite 138
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 29
129% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 167
163% 255 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 96%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
36GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 133 133 131 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 434
Mixed 325
SusWrite 158
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54
188% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 314
252% 353 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: E8TM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 457 456 455 176 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 797
Write 454
Mixed 556
SusWrite 355
120% 541 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 45.5
180% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 339
275% 384 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 126%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 135 135 129 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 172
Write 140
Mixed 38
SusWrite 131
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 49.3
MC Mixed 42.3
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 35.1
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 130%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback