Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 00:47
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 786
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 115
Parallax 94.1
79% 102 fps
MRender 99.8
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 104
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1046 692 280 266 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,486
Write 1,137
Mixed 1,088
SusWrite 598
241% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 83.2
281% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 486
452% 698 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 219%
Great: 271%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
80GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 235 234 238 230 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 437
Write 427
Mixed 330
SusWrite 247
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 25.6
125% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 141
141% 220 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 91%
Intenso SATA III SSD 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 79 78 84 78 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 435
Write 453
Mixed 343
SusWrite 138
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 29
129% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 166
163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 96%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
33GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 134 134 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 456
Mixed 331
SusWrite 170
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.6
186% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 314
252% 353 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: E8TM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 455 456 454 440 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 823
Write 448
Mixed 561
SusWrite 453
127% 571 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 49.4
184% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 337
272% 380 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 135%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
494GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 152 152 152 152 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 168
Write 170
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 145
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 38.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 122%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback