ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 14:17
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 88.6 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 110 57% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 166 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.53 3% 3.67 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.96 4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 313 314 315 307 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 459 Write 438 Mixed 424 SusWrite 323 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 34.7 111% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 357 261% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 129%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 532GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 104 104 104 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.3% Average	Read 87.1 Write 93.2 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 104 119% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GB 749 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback