ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 12:15
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 108 52% 81.1 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 162 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.65 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.96 4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 314 315 303 302 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 436 Write 317 Mixed 300 SusWrite 309 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 26.5 93% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 245 203% 293 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 129%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 344GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 100 99 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 93.8 Write 102 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 100 125% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GB 749 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.5 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback