ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 13:03
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 89 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 106 57% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 166 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.47 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.83 4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 449 445 450 316 278 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 464 Write 441 Mixed 432 SusWrite 397 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 27.8 101% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 353 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 129%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 247GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 30.5 Write 28.2 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 41.9 47% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 142% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GB 749 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback