Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1EK (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 13:34
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 112 55% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 156 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.66 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.96 4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 319 310 310 303 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 462 Write 429 Mixed 416 SusWrite 314 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 33.5 110% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 313 236% 319 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 129%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 924GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 139 137 136 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 137 Write 128 Mixed 71 SusWrite 140 159% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.3 160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GB 749 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM