MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 345%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 423%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics319% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 24 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 hr ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '24 at 00:29
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 182
2-Core 359
114% 212 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,360
122% 1,030 Pts
64-Core 3,151
195% 3,151 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3390 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
319% Outstanding
Lighting 459
Reflection 598
Parallax 878
374% 645 fps
MRender 512
Gravity 596
Splatting 310
371% 473 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 319%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2705 2207 1820 1855 2057 2057 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 1,985
Write 4,033
Mixed 2,084
SusWrite 2,117
580% 2,555 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 75.8
237% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,198
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1,105
825% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 332%
Great: 521%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
420GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2406 2617 1789 1787 1790 1791 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,596
Write 2,431
Mixed 2,869
SusWrite 2,030
560% 2,481 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 80
257% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1316
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1,225
915% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 362%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 43.8
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 33.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 45.1
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 130%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback