MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 322%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 404%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics313% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 24 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 hr ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 00:25
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 352
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,365
120% 1,021 Pts
64-Core 3,098
192% 3,098 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3345 MHz, MLim: 5900 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
313% Outstanding
Lighting 450
Reflection 586
Parallax 859
367% 632 fps
MRender 510
Gravity 583
Splatting 296
362% 463 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 313%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
537GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3339 2393 1796 1889 1911 1936 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,757
Write 4,046
Mixed 3,046
SusWrite 2,210
682% 3,015 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 71.8
233% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,179
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,093
816% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 366%
Great: 521%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
638GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2557 2951 2065 1807 1786 1774 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,678
Write 3,053
Mixed 2,865
SusWrite 2,157
607% 2,688 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 77.3
252% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 1,202
899% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 370%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 40.3
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 42.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback