MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 335%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics319% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 24 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 59 mins ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 01:11
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 336
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,346
119% 1,008 Pts
64-Core 3,196
198% 3,196 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3360 MHz, MLim: 5950 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
319% Outstanding
Lighting 455
Reflection 585
Parallax 866
371% 636 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 611
Splatting 300
376% 481 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 319%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
546GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2624 3076 1770 1801 2031 2071 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,726
Write 3,916
Mixed 3,105
SusWrite 2,229
678% 2994 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 72.9
234% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,047
781% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 364%
Great: 521%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
638GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2077 2801 2763 2742 2028 1569 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,564
Write 2851
Mixed 2778
SusWrite 2330
594% 2,631 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 77.1
246% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,146
854% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 372%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 41.6
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 43
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback