MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 334%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 410%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics309% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 7 days ago, 4 days ago, 1 day ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 12:56
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 179
2-Core 358
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,365
122% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 3134
194% 3134 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3345 MHz, MLim: 5900 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
309% Outstanding
Lighting 440
Reflection 591
Parallax 862
359% 631 fps
MRender 511
Gravity 582
Splatting 304
365% 466 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 309%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$84
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2759 2058 1943 2009 2084 1946 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,699
Write 3,976
Mixed 3,120
SusWrite 2,133
675% 2,982 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 76.8
248% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,203
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1113
829% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 364%
Great: 507%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
420GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2444 2945 2436 1622 1632 1637 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 2,744
Mixed 2,864
SusWrite 2,119
584% 2,586 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 80.1
256% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,217
910% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 368%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 42.8
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 34.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 40.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,601
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback