MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 341%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 413%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics319% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 7 days ago, 4 days ago, 1 day ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 02:42
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 177
2-Core 363
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 708
8-Core 1,391
124% 1,049 Pts
64-Core 2936
182% 2936 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3345 MHz, MLim: 5900 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
319% Outstanding
Lighting 454
Reflection 586
Parallax 863
370% 634 fps
MRender 528
Gravity 606
Splatting 314
378% 482 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 319%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3220 2103 1806 2019 2031 2060 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,770
Write 4,037
Mixed 3,140
SusWrite 2,206
688% 3,038 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 75.8
246% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,103
825% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 371%
Great: 507%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
638GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2485 2903 2925 2552 1552 1533 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,668
Write 2,788
Mixed 2,833
SusWrite 2325
599% 2,653 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 79.2
254% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,212
906% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 381%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 41.7
132% 46.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 43
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,601
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback