Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 09:28
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 850
81% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
Asus(1043 8930) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 4350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 65
Parallax 65
53% 65 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 65
Splatting 65
53% 65 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
498GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3179 3451 3223 2120 1444 1418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 1,983
Write 4,345
Mixed 3,320
SusWrite 2,472
691% 3,030 MB/s
4K Read 82.8
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 110
358% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 748
570% 776 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 377%
Great: 521%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
46GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 75 75 103 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 472
Write 196
Mixed 328
SusWrite 107
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 37.3
137% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 131
110% 157 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
14GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 147 97 92 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,262
Write 177
Mixed 1,208
SusWrite 137
154% 696 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 82.3
273% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 616
516% 755 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 181%
Great: 340%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
70GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 178 175 173 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
129GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 147 133 120 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 66
Write 115
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 137
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
44GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 115 105 106 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 64.7
Write 97.5
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 112
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3200 C164 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 65" 1280 720 PHL04C3 Philips FTV
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback