HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 22 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 13:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 211
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 578
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3718 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Lighting 83.4
Reflection 120
Parallax 80.8
68% 94.6 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 63
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 856
Write 1,418
Mixed 827
233% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 683
512% 688 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 239%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 72 77 80 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 62
Write 91.6
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 76.7
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
203GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 95 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 91.1
126% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
201GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 138
Write 140
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 84.9
121% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSCDE2E VX2452 Series
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback